The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs
Terms of Service
Hall of fame
About this site
Sand and Sea
How to critique a photograph
NOTE! This guide originates from an article in the Canadian Camera magazine (Spring 2004) by Andre Cabuche, AFIAP. If there is any issue with reproducing it here, it can be removed immediately.
The purpose of critiquing photographs should be to help photographers to improve their work through a better understanding and proficiency in the technical aspects of photography and the theory of visual literacy, and this while helping the photographer maintain his or her individuality and way of seeing.
The critique should attempt to open the photographer's own thought process; it should not be an attempt to change the photographer into a clone of the assessor - the very curse to creativity.
It is essential to determine the photographer's purpose for making the image: Was it to be a clinical study, story illustration, social documentary, fine art piece or perhaps an entry for a competition? Only then can the critique be properly focussed to assist the photographer along an effective learning path.
1. TECHNICAL QUALITY
Editors, judges and evaluators all agree: a successful photographic image must have good technical quality to start with.
Affected by the camera viewpoint and focal length of the lens. It can raise an image from a technical success to an artistic success!
3. EMOTIONAL APPEAL
The vital element for a truly great image, making it unique and memorable.
Every one is free to give a personal weight to the different parts outlined above, but a serious critique should consider each and one of the points.
Now, browse the images at MyOlympus and give some constructive critiques! We all need that to improve our skills!
|Copyright ©2004, MyOlympus.org. All Rights Reserved.|