The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus and OM system micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Register Search Forum Actions New Document New Folder List Folders List Documents List Groups List Users Camera resources Olympus 4000 Olympus 4040 Olympus 5050 Olympus 5060 Olympus 7070 Olympus 8080 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus E-M5 Olympus E-P1 Olympus E-P2 Olympus E-PL1 Olympus E-PL3 Olympus E1 Olympus E3 Olympus E30 Olympus E300 Olympus E330 Olympus E400 Olympus E410 Olympus E420 Olympus E500 Olympus E510 Olympus E520 Olympus E620 m4/3 lenses Camera FAQs Terms of Service Photo contest Submissions page Hall of fame Folders About this site Documents Polls Private folders Public folders Categories Abstract Action/Motion Animal Architecture Candid/Snapshot Cities/Urban Documentation Fashion/Glamour Historical Landscape Macro Miscellaneous Nature Night/Low light People Polls Sand and Sea Sky Tourist/Travel Contact Us |
Coal Tit
Just got a Sigma 50-500mm lens so was testing it out for the first time. It's perfect for photographing little birds, but boy is it heavy!!!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright ©2004, MyOlympus.org. All Rights Reserved. |
Coal Tit
Karen,
I was wondering how you managed to get so close when I first saw this shot!
Congratulations on the new lens, it seems to be doing a good job for you.
Was the focal length 420mm, 840mm actual, I am interested to know how difficult it is to steady the camera with this magnification?
Keep up the good work, Peter
Peter French at 19:51 CET on 27-Feb-2007 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Peter French wrote:
> Karen,
>
> I was wondering how you managed to get so close when I first saw this shot!
> Congratulations on the new lens, it seems to be doing a good job for you.
> Was the focal length 420mm, 840mm actual, I am interested to know how difficult it is to
> steady the camera with this magnification?
> Keep up the good work, Peter
>
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your comments, much appreciated. To answer your question about the Bigma lens, this shot is hand-held, I found it quite easy to keep it steady, but after a while it gets really heavy and a tripod is definetly for long photo sessions. I'm not sure about the magnification, it is supposed to be x2 on the 4/3 system, but I don't really know. It's a great lens for the price and makes life a lot easier for photographing the little birds.
Hope this helps you, if you or Karen have any other queries just let me know. P.S. is any of Karen's photos on here, I was looking for them but can't find any?
Hope you're both well,
Karen
Karen Jack at 09:56 CET on 01-Mar-2007 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Shelley O'Connell wrote:
> Hi Karen,
>
> You certainly took full advantage of your new lens. The detail in the feathers, the catch
> light in the eye and nicely balanced composition make for a great photo.
> Like Peter, I wonder if you used a tripod. I have been able to use my Oly 50-200 without a
> tripod for larger animals but I don't have a steady enough hand to capture birds.
>
> Regards,
> Shelley
>
Hi Shelley,
Thanks for your comments, appreciated. I shot this and two other bird photos hand-held, I found it quite easy to keep the lens steady, but after about 1 hour my arms were getting sore as the Bigma is very heavy, so you'll definetly need a tripod for long photo sessions. But for the money it's a great lens, especially if you're into wildlife shots; an all-in-one lens. Hope this helps you.
All the best,
karen
Karen Jack at 09:59 CET on 01-Mar-2007 [Reply]