MyOlympus.org
The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs

old church

old church
Copyright ©2006, Andrew Mclean
Viewed times

outside of an old run down church next to my caravan

Photographer: Andrew Mclean
Folder: starting out
Uploaded: 03-May-2006 21:01 CEST
Current Rating: 7.00/1
View all ratings
Delete my rating
Model release available:
Camera: Olympus E500
Exposure time:
Aperture:
Focal length:
Lens:
Focusing method:
ISO:
White balance:
Flash: no
Image format:
Processing applied:
Various:
Image resized to: 750x563

Comment/Rate Share this Image

NO SUBJECT

The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
Cheers Steve

Steve Elliott at 07:18 CEST on 04-May-2006 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Steve Elliott wrote:
> The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want
> to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective
> dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
> Cheers Steve
>
thankyou again for your comment steve
the image is lightend for the shot i took as i was wanting to get a darkend sky, took another with the
exp normal but the lack of a tripod ment the two shots were at slightly different angles :(
so i messed around in photoshop with the first .
isee that if i lightend the building more and darkend the sky there would be a greater contrast between the two .

time to start playing

thanks again for your comments as i say i have a lot to learn

andy

Andrew Mclean at 20:40 CEST on 04-May-2006 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Steve Elliott wrote:
> The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want
> to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective
> dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
> Cheers Steve
>
thankyou again for your comment steve
the image is lightend for the shot i took as i was wanting to get a darkend sky, took another with the
exp normal but the lack of a tripod ment the two shots were at slightly different angles :(
so i messed around in photoshop with the first .
isee that if i lightend the building more and darkend the sky there would be a greater contrast between the two .

time to start playing

thanks again for your comments as i say i have a lot to learn

andy

Andrew Mclean at 20:40 CEST on 04-May-2006 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

andrew mclean wrote:
> Steve Elliott wrote:
> > The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want
> > to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective
> > dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
> > Cheers Steve
> >
> thankyou again for your comment steve
> the image is lightend for the shot i took as i was wanting to get a darkend sky, took another with the
> exp normal but the lack of a tripod ment the two shots were at slightly different angles :(
> so i messed around in photoshop with the first .
> isee that if i lightend the building more and darkend the sky there would be a greater contrast
> between the two .
>
> time to start playing
>
> thanks again for your comments as i say i have a lot to learn
>
> andy
>

Hi Andy
Not sure if you shoot RAW or not but it is well worth doing so as in this situation you could convert the image twice, once for the sky and once for the shadows then putting them in separate layers in PS and erasing say the burnt out sky from one layer to leave the correct sky shot underneath, and with a little playing with levels etc you should end up with a satisfactory result.
Cheers Steve

Steve Elliott at 07:30 CEST on 05-May-2006 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Steve Elliott wrote:
> andrew mclean wrote:
> > Steve Elliott wrote:
> > > The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want
> > > to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective
> > > dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
> > > Cheers Steve
> > >
> > thankyou again for your comment steve
> > the image is lightend for the shot i took as i was wanting to get a darkend sky, took another with the
> > exp normal but the lack of a tripod ment the two shots were at slightly different angles :(
> > so i messed around in photoshop with the first .
> > isee that if i lightend the building more and darkend the sky there would be a greater contrast
> > between the two .
> >
> > time to start playing
> >
> > thanks again for your comments as i say i have a lot to learn
> >
> > andy
> >
>
> Hi Andy
> Not sure if you shoot RAW or not but it is well worth doing so as in this situation you could
> convert the image twice, once for the sky and once for the shadows then putting them in separate
> layers in PS and erasing say the burnt out sky from one layer to leave the correct sky shot
> underneath, and with a little playing with levels etc you should end up with a satisfactory result.
> Cheers Steve
>
thanks again steve
i have tried this and the result is alot better
thanks again
andy

Andrew Mclean at 16:11 CEST on 06-May-2006 [Reply]