old church
Copyright ©2006, Andrew Mclean
Viewed times
outside of an old run down church next to my caravan
Photographer: |
Andrew Mclean
|
Folder: |
starting out |
Uploaded: |
03-May-2006 21:01 CEST |
Current Rating: |
7.00/1
View all ratings
Delete my rating
|
Model release available: |
|
Camera: |
Olympus E500 |
Exposure time: |
|
Aperture: |
|
Focal length: |
|
Lens: |
|
Focusing method: |
|
ISO: |
|
White balance: |
|
Flash: |
no |
Image format: |
|
Processing applied: |
|
Various: |
|
Image resized to: |
750x563 |
Comment/Rate
Share this Image
|
NO SUBJECT
The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
Cheers Steve
Steve Elliott at 07:18 CEST on 04-May-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Steve Elliott wrote:
> The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want
> to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective
> dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
> Cheers Steve
>
thankyou again for your comment steve
the image is lightend for the shot i took as i was wanting to get a darkend sky, took another with the
exp normal but the lack of a tripod ment the two shots were at slightly different angles :(
so i messed around in photoshop with the first .
isee that if i lightend the building more and darkend the sky there would be a greater contrast between the two .
time to start playing
thanks again for your comments as i say i have a lot to learn
andy
Andrew Mclean at 20:40 CEST on 04-May-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Steve Elliott wrote:
> The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want
> to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective
> dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
> Cheers Steve
>
thankyou again for your comment steve
the image is lightend for the shot i took as i was wanting to get a darkend sky, took another with the
exp normal but the lack of a tripod ment the two shots were at slightly different angles :(
so i messed around in photoshop with the first .
isee that if i lightend the building more and darkend the sky there would be a greater contrast between the two .
time to start playing
thanks again for your comments as i say i have a lot to learn
andy
Andrew Mclean at 20:40 CEST on 04-May-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
andrew mclean wrote:
> Steve Elliott wrote:
> > The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want
> > to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective
> > dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
> > Cheers Steve
> >
> thankyou again for your comment steve
> the image is lightend for the shot i took as i was wanting to get a darkend sky, took another with the
> exp normal but the lack of a tripod ment the two shots were at slightly different angles :(
> so i messed around in photoshop with the first .
> isee that if i lightend the building more and darkend the sky there would be a greater contrast
> between the two .
>
> time to start playing
>
> thanks again for your comments as i say i have a lot to learn
>
> andy
>
Hi Andy
Not sure if you shoot RAW or not but it is well worth doing so as in this situation you could convert the image twice, once for the sky and once for the shadows then putting them in separate layers in PS and erasing say the burnt out sky from one layer to leave the correct sky shot underneath, and with a little playing with levels etc you should end up with a satisfactory result.
Cheers Steve
Steve Elliott at 07:30 CEST on 05-May-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Steve Elliott wrote:
> andrew mclean wrote:
> > Steve Elliott wrote:
> > > The conversion gives this a sinister feel and makes you think of a place you wouldn't want
> > > to visit a night, overall I think this is a little on the dark side and with some selective
> > > dodging could bring out some more detail from the shadows.
> > > Cheers Steve
> > >
> > thankyou again for your comment steve
> > the image is lightend for the shot i took as i was wanting to get a darkend sky, took another with the
> > exp normal but the lack of a tripod ment the two shots were at slightly different angles :(
> > so i messed around in photoshop with the first .
> > isee that if i lightend the building more and darkend the sky there would be a greater contrast
> > between the two .
> >
> > time to start playing
> >
> > thanks again for your comments as i say i have a lot to learn
> >
> > andy
> >
>
> Hi Andy
> Not sure if you shoot RAW or not but it is well worth doing so as in this situation you could
> convert the image twice, once for the sky and once for the shadows then putting them in separate
> layers in PS and erasing say the burnt out sky from one layer to leave the correct sky shot
> underneath, and with a little playing with levels etc you should end up with a satisfactory result.
> Cheers Steve
>
thanks again steve
i have tried this and the result is alot better
thanks again
andy
Andrew Mclean at 16:11 CEST on 06-May-2006 [Reply]