Hi Sergey ,

I see you use the ZD50-200mm for indoor shooting, I think it worked pretty good isn't it.
See also you have the E-500 , you keep on walking with Oly ones you try them out you get adicted .

regards,

Fons van Swaal wrote:
> Hi Sergey ,
>
> I see you use the ZD50-200mm for indoor shooting, I think it worked pretty good isn't it.
> See also you have the E-500 , you keep on walking with Oly ones you try them out you get adicted .
>
> regards,
>
Thanks Fons, for the comment,

It was not in plans to use 50-200 for indoor shooting. I only walked into a church (where it was dry) to change the lens and saw what appeared to be a keeper diligently aspiring over some books and plans. I took a shot on my way out.

I was waiting for E500 to come out, since there was so much publicity about it. I saw the reviews were not bad, and the prize (body only, in my case) was about right. The later allowed me to buy better lenses instead. The 14-54 and 50-200 are very good quality lenses indeed. I can not even compare them against anything, since those are the best I ever had and tried. The cameras do get outdated relatively fast (in most cases), but the good glass (I hope) stays.

I will probably get 11-22 somewhere towards summer (since I mostly like wide angle type photography) but this is not in the immediate plans yet.

Thx,
-

Another great shot Sergey.........regards bevellee