The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus and OM system micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Register Search Forum Actions New Document New Folder List Folders List Documents List Groups List Users Camera resources Olympus 4000 Olympus 4040 Olympus 5050 Olympus 5060 Olympus 7070 Olympus 8080 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus E-M5 Olympus E-P1 Olympus E-P2 Olympus E-PL1 Olympus E-PL3 Olympus E1 Olympus E3 Olympus E30 Olympus E300 Olympus E330 Olympus E400 Olympus E410 Olympus E420 Olympus E500 Olympus E510 Olympus E520 Olympus E620 m4/3 lenses Camera FAQs Terms of Service Photo contest Submissions page Hall of fame Folders About this site Documents Polls Private folders Public folders Categories Abstract Action/Motion Animal Architecture Candid/Snapshot Cities/Urban Documentation Fashion/Glamour Historical Landscape Macro Miscellaneous Nature Night/Low light People Polls Sand and Sea Sky Tourist/Travel Contact Us |
Bumble Bee (3)
Yesterday I bought a standard 50mm 1.4 OM lens thru the internet , connected to my E-1 with OM adapter plus 1.4 teleconverter I came to this result.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright ©2004, MyOlympus.org. All Rights Reserved. |
Very good attempt
In my book this is a very good attempt for a second try macro, like the motion blur of the wing's. You E1 guy's have me contemplating if this model camera is going to be my next purchase to move up to the DSLR world, really like the results it produces. Regards.
Kerland Elder at 18:15 CEST on 26-Jun-2005 [Reply]
macro....?
Thanks Kerland for the comment , i.m.o this is not a macro? This standard lens is a regular one 50mm 1.4 OM . Connected to the 1.4 tele-converter there is some magnification off the subject. It comes very close to macro but i.m.o. real macro is far better than this one. Still I think it was worth trying with this OM lens , we have to try all possibilities we have isn?t it. Thanks again, best regards?.
Fonzy - at 18:31 CEST on 26-Jun-2005 [Reply]
Oooop's !!!!
Oooop's , sounds like I'm tripping, sorry bout that Fons, still like the motion blur of the wings
Kerland Elder at 19:38 CEST on 26-Jun-2005 [Reply]
Bumble bee (3)
This shot raises a question. How many times the wings are stroken in 1/250 of a second? Is there a human technology that allows such a performance? Very nice picture.
Piero Magnani at 00:16 CEST on 27-Jun-2005 [Reply]
Strokes of the wings
Thanks Piero, you are right human eye is not equipt to catch the strokes of the wings,camera however does...
Fonzy - at 17:09 CEST on 03-Jul-2005 [Reply]
Belated comment...;-)
Thanks Juan for looking at my pictures when you arrived safely back from the USA. The bumble bee is flapping her wings so many times a sec, and bumping on to the flower that alone is the reason for un sharpness I think. The main reason to post it was to show her wings , you really can see the vibration of it. The name ?Hummel? sounds familiar , in Holland we call it a Hommel , Almost the same isn?t it.. Again thanks and best regards,
Fonzy - at 20:32 CEST on 28-Jul-2005 [Reply]