MyOlympus.org - The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus and OM System micro 4/3 Digital Cameras and E-series DSLRs

The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus and OM system micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs

MyOlympus.org > Private folders > Others > Tulip...

Tulip...

←Back

Next→

Reproductive organs of a tulip.

Photographer:	X Victor Biefnot
Folder:	Others
Uploaded:	19-Apr-2011 10:07 CEST
Current Rating:	8.60/5 View all ratings Delete my rating
Model release available:	1
Camera:	Olympus E-500
Exposure time:	1/80 sec.
Aperture:	F:11
Focal length:	70mm
Lens:	Olympus 35 f:3,5
Focusing method:	iESP
ISO:	200
White balance:	Auto
Flash:	internal
Image format:	SHQ
Processing applied:	Processed in ULead PhotoImpact12.
Various:	Handheld. Flash power at 1/64th.
Image resized to:	523x579

Comment/Rate Share this Image

NO SUBJECT

Perfect DOF and sharpness (flower is completely in focus, background is totally blurred). Not the conventional flower shot, very creative idea to shoot a flower this way.

Alfred Molon at 20:44 CEST on 19-Apr-2011 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Alfred Molon wrote:
> Perfect DOF and sharpness (flower is completely in focus, background is totally blurred).
> Not the conventional flower shot, very creative idea to shoot a flower this way.
>

Thank you very much Alfred for your comment and rating.
I appreciate.
My regard. Victor

Victor Biefnot at 15:43 CEST on 20-Apr-2011 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Beautifull colors,nice sharp shot.
Regards

syed noman at 00:44 CEST on 23-Apr-2011 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

syed noman wrote:
> Beautifull colors,nice sharp shot.
> Regards
>
Thanks a lot Syed for your appreciation.
I appreciate...
Regards, Victor.

Victor Biefnot at 19:00 CEST on 23-Apr-2011 [Reply]

tulip

Superb idea, capture and processing. I may have to get the 35mm macro - it seems to be very high quality in a small, relatively inexpensive package.

Tom Barry at 22:25 CEST on 24-Apr-2011 [Reply]

Tulip

Tom Barry wrote:
> Superb idea, capture and processing. I may have to get the 35mm macro - it seems to be very
> high quality in a small, relatively inexpensive package.
>
Thank you very much, Tom, for your comment and rating. It' s very kind of you.
Concerning the 35mm macro, I think you are right: it's a good lens. I don't use it very often, but each time I do,
I find it statisfying: it is light, well made with a metal mount. Has a good reactivity, no CA. Sure it can't rivalize with the multi-purpose qualified 50 f:2 macro, but it is rather sharp, 2/1 macro, not pricy at all, and even able to deliver fine delailed pictures in some kinds of architecture and landscape shots (a matter of view angle, indeed).
I never try it for portraying. I guess it is too short for that. But who knows ?

Regards.Victor

Victor Biefnot at 10:18 CEST on 26-Apr-2011 [Reply]

Vibrant colors

Victor,

I have taken a ton of flower pictures and none stand out like this one. Really enjoy the composition, sharpness and vibrant colors. Good work.

Mark Stodter at 21:11 CEST on 26-May-2011 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Mark Stodter wrote:
> Victor,
>
> I have taken a ton of flower pictures and none stand out like this one. Really enjoy the
> composition, sharpness and vibrant colors. Good work.

> Thank you very much Mark for this compliment
Sometimes "the lucky strike" ...
Have a fine day. Victor.

Victor Biefnot at 10:41 CEST on 27-May-2011 [Reply]