Bexhill-on-Sea
Copyright ©2011, Cleveland Aaron
Viewed times
Photographer: |
Cleveland Aaron
|
Folder: |
R.Cleveland Aaron |
Uploaded: |
16-Feb-2011 13:56 CET |
Current Rating: |
6.00/2
View all ratings
Delete my rating
|
Model release available: |
|
Camera: |
Olympus E-1 |
Exposure time: |
1/2500 s |
Aperture: |
F5.6 |
Focal length: |
13 mm |
Lens: |
|
Focusing method: |
|
ISO: |
100 |
White balance: |
|
Flash: |
no |
Image format: |
|
Processing applied: |
|
Various: |
|
Image resized to: |
825x1100 |
Comment/Rate
Share this Image
|
NO SUBJECT
I like this, the huts contrasting against the brick houses behind. I did wonder about the expanse of shingle in the foreground but after looking a few times I think it works ok and is balanced by the busy top part of the image.
A brave compositional decision I think
Mike
Mike Bywater at 23:47 CET on 16-Feb-2011 [Reply]
Bexhill
Thanks Mike, this image was shot for the design company producing a brochure for a property development company. The idea was to emphasise the idea of a quaint town by the sea. I always set out to create thought provoking images with my work, challenging the viewers perception of what they know against what the see. (If that makes sense?)
Cleveland Aaron at 21:46 CET on 17-Feb-2011 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
BTW, heavy vignetting (look at the bottom corners). Perhaps a smaller aperture would have helped?
Alfred Molon at 15:53 CET on 18-Feb-2011 [Reply]
Bexhill
Thanks Alfred but please read my reply to Mike. I've spent over 10 years working in advertising photography and I receive commissions and have been awarded for my interpretations of complexed art directions. However, your views are always welcome my friend!
Cleveland Aaron at 16:15 CET on 18-Feb-2011 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Cleveland Aaron wrote:
> Thanks Alfred but please read my reply to Mike. I've spent over 10 years working in advertising
> photography and I receive commissions and have been awarded for my interpretations of complexed
> art directions. However, your views are always welcome my friend!
You mean, the vignetting is intentional? I thought it was a technical lens issue. If you used vignetting intentionally, ignore my comment.
Alfred Molon at 20:12 CET on 18-Feb-2011 [Reply]
Bexhill
Most definitely intentional, Alfred.
Cleveland Aaron at 15:21 CET on 21-Feb-2011 [Reply]