The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus and OM system micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Register Search Forum Actions New Document New Folder List Folders List Documents List Groups List Users Camera resources Olympus 4000 Olympus 4040 Olympus 5050 Olympus 5060 Olympus 7070 Olympus 8080 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus E-M5 Olympus E-P1 Olympus E-P2 Olympus E-PL1 Olympus E-PL3 Olympus E1 Olympus E3 Olympus E30 Olympus E300 Olympus E330 Olympus E400 Olympus E410 Olympus E420 Olympus E500 Olympus E510 Olympus E520 Olympus E620 m4/3 lenses Camera FAQs Terms of Service Photo contest Submissions page Hall of fame Folders About this site Documents Polls Private folders Public folders Categories Abstract Action/Motion Animal Architecture Candid/Snapshot Cities/Urban Documentation Fashion/Glamour Historical Landscape Macro Miscellaneous Nature Night/Low light People Polls Sand and Sea Sky Tourist/Travel Contact Us |
the Doorkeeper
Here is the doorkeeper of the Hornet's house.
The hornets have their nest in a bird's nesting box on our house wall and I have made a rig so that I can take images of them. An interesting observation is that they always have a 'doorkeeper' that is guarding the entrance. This is a portrait of the doorkeeper taken at an instant when it looked like it was wondering why I hadn't left yet... Cheers, Jens.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright ©2004, MyOlympus.org. All Rights Reserved. |
NO SUBJECT
Amazing macro. Very nice portrait of the Guardian of the Hornet?s house, thanks for share with us your technique. Best regards, Ricardo
Ricardo Rico at 12:14 CEST on 26-Sep-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Jens, once again you got my attention with an incredible macro.
Loren Lewis at 16:29 CEST on 26-Sep-2006 [Reply]
Adrie,
Adrie Hubregtsen wrote:
> Great shot Jens, very sharp, BUT how can it be, by the use of aperture 11, there?s NOT much
> DOF in the photo???.
No, that is true and it will always be very shallow at this magnification which is 0.9. However, I think that you are right in your observation that is is a bit shallower DOF than expected. The reason is that that the real focal length is shorter than indicated in the EXIF. The value F/11 is based on calculations using the nominal values as read in EXIF data: Focal length 283 mm and F/16.
However, the true focal length of modern zoom lenses with internal focussing is often considerably shorter than what is written on the lens or in the EXIF when they are focussed close to their closest distance. So, assuming that the real focal length is 200 mm instead of 283 mm would mean that the focal length with the 500D in this case would be 142 mm and the aperture would become f/8. Seems reasonable.
Cheers, Jens.
Jens Birch at 20:32 CEST on 27-Sep-2006 [Reply]