The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus and OM system micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Register Search Forum Actions New Document New Folder List Folders List Documents List Groups List Users Camera resources Olympus 4000 Olympus 4040 Olympus 5050 Olympus 5060 Olympus 7070 Olympus 8080 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus E-M5 Olympus E-P1 Olympus E-P2 Olympus E-PL1 Olympus E-PL3 Olympus E1 Olympus E3 Olympus E30 Olympus E300 Olympus E330 Olympus E400 Olympus E410 Olympus E420 Olympus E500 Olympus E510 Olympus E520 Olympus E620 m4/3 lenses Camera FAQs Terms of Service Photo contest Submissions page Hall of fame Folders About this site Documents Polls Private folders Public folders Categories Abstract Action/Motion Animal Architecture Candid/Snapshot Cities/Urban Documentation Fashion/Glamour Historical Landscape Macro Miscellaneous Nature Night/Low light People Polls Sand and Sea Sky Tourist/Travel Contact Us |
Grey Heron Landing
These birds are to darn big, it's hard to get them in the frame.
I had to follow the Heron while it whas decending, shot is made handhold and there fore IMO not 100% sharp..
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright ©2004, MyOlympus.org. All Rights Reserved. |
Blue Heron Landing
So you go for Jurassic motif, huh? I think focus is just about ok, but the area above the neck does look as if the highlights are gone. You can fiddle with it if this is a RAW (I would), to bring out most of the detail. I would also add some warmer tones to this frame.
-
Sergey Green at 19:20 CET on 26-Jan-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Thanks Sergey for the advice, I will start and "fiddle" with it.;-)
It is shot in RAW , see what I can do to make it better.
regards,
PS
1-I am glad there are people on the MO site who take the time to analyse a picture.
2-They give critics and good advice .
3-Thanks to them we can learn and perhaps improve our skils.
Fonzy - at 22:02 CET on 26-Jan-2006 [Reply]
Blue Heron Landing
Hi Fons,
So so far you have tried this lens on few shots and you also have 1.4x + 50-200; how would you compare them against one another? The 300 will hardly give you any CA and colors should be just next to perfect, but is the difference (other than in price) significantly noticeable?
You have also tried the older OM lenses; is the digital glass much better than the old timers or is the gain only visible in focus and speed (other than price again)?
-
Sergey Green at 17:15 CET on 27-Jan-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Nice shot Fons, Regards...Ricardo
Ricardo Rico at 20:37 CET on 27-Jan-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Thanks for the comment Ricardo.
I am glad you like it...;-)
Cheers,
Fonzy - at 21:49 CET on 27-Jan-2006 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Thanks Shelley for the comment.
The answer to Sergey is coming your way.....
Regards,
Fonzy - at 22:26 CET on 27-Jan-2006 [Reply]