The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus and OM system micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Register Search Forum Actions New Document New Folder List Folders List Documents List Groups List Users Camera resources Olympus 4000 Olympus 4040 Olympus 5050 Olympus 5060 Olympus 7070 Olympus 8080 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus E-M5 Olympus E-P1 Olympus E-P2 Olympus E-PL1 Olympus E-PL3 Olympus E1 Olympus E3 Olympus E30 Olympus E300 Olympus E330 Olympus E400 Olympus E410 Olympus E420 Olympus E500 Olympus E510 Olympus E520 Olympus E620 m4/3 lenses Camera FAQs Terms of Service Photo contest Submissions page Hall of fame Folders About this site Documents Polls Private folders Public folders Categories Abstract Action/Motion Animal Architecture Candid/Snapshot Cities/Urban Documentation Fashion/Glamour Historical Landscape Macro Miscellaneous Nature Night/Low light People Polls Sand and Sea Sky Tourist/Travel Contact Us |
Lhasa valley
View of the Lhasa valley from the Ganden monastery (4500m). Panorama stitch of three images.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright ©2004, MyOlympus.org. All Rights Reserved. |
NO SUBJECT
Great atmosphere. Can you tell something about the distances?
Udo Altmann at 21:55 CET on 16-Nov-2005 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
I realy like those pano shots, well done..
Best regards,
Fonzy - at 22:23 CET on 16-Nov-2005 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
I'm a big fan of panoramics Alfred, this is an excellent one you have included some foreground detail which gives depth to the shot and gives a sense of scale, fabulous view.
Best wishes Steve
Steve Elliott at 08:50 CET on 17-Nov-2005 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Udo Altmann wrote:
> Great atmosphere. Can you tell something about the distances?
Distance to Lhasa? It's about 1:30h by car (60-80km). From the Lhasa valley (3700m) to the monastery it's 20-30 minutes.
Alfred Molon at 18:32 CET on 17-Nov-2005 [Reply]
Lhasa
Hey Alfred, nice image but it looks like it's been overworked in photoshop. Do you always manipulate?
Cleveland Aaron at 14:20 CEST on 15-Aug-2010 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Cleveland Aaron wrote:
> Hey Alfred, nice image but it looks like it's been overworked in photoshop. Do you always
> manipulate?
It's a panorama stitch, that is why the perspective is like that. Or what specifically do you mean with manipulate?
Alfred Molon at 18:35 CEST on 15-Aug-2010 [Reply]
Lhasa valley
Hi Alfred, I know the image was stitched. By manipulated I mean colours, contrast & Sharpness. It's a lovely image nonetheless, I was just curious.
Cleveland.
Cleveland Aaron at 21:23 CEST on 15-Aug-2010 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Cleveland Aaron wrote:
> Hi Alfred, I know the image was stitched. By manipulated I mean colours, contrast & Sharpness.
> It's a lovely image nonetheless, I was just curious.
The processing applied is actually quite simple:
- RAW conversion (with a certain choice of contrast, saturation, white balance etc.)
- panorama stitching
- some postprocessing to fill the gaps, typically by cloning parts of the sky in case the images do not overlap properly which often is the case with panorama sequences shot without a panorama head)
The sky has this variation of brightness due to the use of a polariser filter and the wide angle of view. Some people choose not to use a polariser filter for this reason.
Alfred Molon at 21:51 CEST on 15-Aug-2010 [Reply]