Very good shot of this actor, missing the fingers off the hands to complete the shot......

You are completely right. Unfortunately I perceived it after the end of the performance. But I was fashinated by the expression and I decided to keep the picture, because a crop of the face without the attitude of the body was less meaningful. Thank you, Fons.

Godd shot but I think there is to much blur around arms and missing some up by the hair

Reece Werenka wrote:
> Godd shot but I think there is to much blur around arms and missing some up by the hair
>
Thank you Reece,
this picture is far from beeing technically perfect. It was taken during the stage play: the fingers are missing, for instance. The slow exposure time has not prevented from having some blur.
As a snapshot the reason for my proposing it is the interesting expression of the actor.
A question I have is: can a picture be accepted even if not technically perfect? I got a lot of different answers.
I appreciate your comment, have a good day
Piero

Reece Werenka wrote:
> Good shot but I think there is to much blur around arms and missing some up by the hair
>
My attention was immediately drawn towards the actors face so to answer your question yes it definitely can be accepted because of the fact that what you were trying to capture was the unique expression this actor had. The only reason I commented on the blur was because I looked at almost every part of the photograph. Keep up the good work ! Have a good day as well !