Olympus 5050 super macro vs
diopter comparison
Back to
the Olympus 5050 online resource
By Charles Dilks
A piece of graph paper with ten 1mm
fine divisions separated by heavy lines 1cm apart; medium lines 5mm apart
was placed on a light box. The camera was mounted on a macro focusing rail
which was mounted on a tripod. The shots were made in SHQ mode at f4, ESP
autofocus using the remote.
For the super macro shot the lens
to subject distance was 1 inch. Using a +2 and a +4 diopter to get approximately
the same magnification the lens to subject distance was 3.5 inches in normal
focus mode.
It has been stated on discussion
groups that the barrel distortion in supermacro mode is noticeable and
the close focusing of 1 inch that is necessary makes it difficult to light
the subject.
Observations
-
Barrel distortion is evident in Photo
1 (Oly super macro). It is not in Photo 2 (Diopters and normal focus).
-
The color difference between the two
photos is real and not a matter of exposure. The real color is something
between the two.
-
The "a" photos are 300% blowups of the
pencil index marks in the lower right corners of the photos. Photo 1 looks
better. It looks to me like there isn't any better resolution, but more
contrast.
-
As with everything in life it's a compromise.
If you can live with barrel distortion and difficult lighting the built
in super macro is a nice, handy feature. If you want a lack of barrel distortion,
easier lighting with a bit less contrast and are willing to go to the effort
and minor expense, the diopter route is the one to take.
Back to
the Olympus 5050 online resource