MyOlympus.org
The Photographic Community for Users of Olympus micro 4/3 digital cameras and E-series DSLRs
MyOlympus.orgPrivate folders > Animals > Teneral Male Four Spotted Chaser

Teneral Male Four Spotted Chaser

Teneral Male Four Spotted Chaser
Copyright ©2006, Albert Conroy
Viewed times

I realise that the background is a bit fussy, but I wanted to capture the light refraction in the wings, and I think the bg helps this.

Monopod used

Photographer: Albert Conroy
Folder: Animals
Uploaded: 04-Jun-2006 21:47 CEST
Current Rating: 10.00/2
View all ratings
Delete my rating
Model release available:
Camera: Olympus E1
Exposure time: 1/320
Aperture: f4.9
Focal length: 566
Lens: 50-200mm + 1.4 tc
Focusing method: iESP P-AF
ISO: 200
White balance: Auto
Flash: no
Image format: RAW
Processing applied:
Various:
Image resized to: 547x800

Comment/Rate Share this Image

Teneral Male Four Spotted Chaser

Yes the light is interesting and the wings are quite well detailed. I like the colors a lot, usually this kind of greens come after ps color balance but hardly out of camera. The DOF is about right, perhaps slightly distractive grass trunks, but not much. I am a bit surprised to see these kind of shots with 50-200. Mine always come out a bit soft, especially with 1/320 or so. Well done,

-

Sergey Green at 17:18 CEST on 05-Jun-2006 [Reply]

Beautiful....!

Excellent shot Albert, very sharp and beautiful light...
Here we can see the quality of the E-1 in combination with the ED50-200 plus EC1.4
I refer to Sergey because he is surpriced but he is shooting with an E-500...I also have both these camera's the E-1 and the E-500 and my conclusion is that the E-1 is better in these kind of shootings...and you proved it again..

Best regards,

Fonzy - at 19:55 CEST on 05-Jun-2006 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Sergey Green wrote:
> Yes the light is interesting and the wings are quite well detailed. I like the colors a lot,
> usually this kind of greens come after ps color balance but hardly out of camera. The DOF
> is about right, perhaps slightly distractive grass trunks, but not much. I am a bit surprised
> to see these kind of shots with 50-200. Mine always come out a bit soft, especially with 1/320
> or so. Well done,
>
> -
>
Thanks Sergey for your comment - yes you are correct I did increase the saturation slightly in pp, but that was in order to enhance the colours in the wing. I don't know if it may help you but when I use a monopod with the 50-200mm, I do not use the tripod collar supplied with the lens as I find it more difficult to hold steady.

Thanks again

Albert

Albert Conroy at 22:50 CEST on 05-Jun-2006 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Fons van Swaal. wrote:
> Excellent shot Albert, very sharp and beautiful light...
> Here we can see the quality of the E-1 in combination with the ED50-200 plus EC1.4
> I refer to Sergey because he is surpriced but he is shooting with an E-500...I also have both
> these camera's the E-1 and the E-500 and my conclusion is that the E-1 is better in these
> kind of shootings...and you proved it again..
>
> Best regards,
>


Thanks for your comment Fons - the dragonfly had just emerged and the imago was lower down the reed. I agree with you regarding the E1 - I think the difference may be due to the quality of the pixels in the E1. I also have an E300 and I struggle to get the same quality in close up pictures.

Regards

Albert

Albert Conroy at 22:54 CEST on 05-Jun-2006 [Reply]